<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Bankruptcy Articles &#38; Information &#187; Damages</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bankruptcy-articles.com/tag/damages/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bankruptcy-articles.com</link>
	<description>Bankruptcy Information for You!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 17:42:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
		<item>
		<title>A Creditor May Recover Damages for Stay Violation</title>
		<link>http://www.bankruptcy-articles.com/2010/05/a-creditor-may-recover-damages-for-stay-violation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bankruptcy-articles.com/2010/05/a-creditor-may-recover-damages-for-stay-violation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 May 2010 02:18:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bankruptcy Articles</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Creditor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Damages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recover]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[violation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bankruptcy-articles.com/2010/05/a-creditor-may-recover-damages-for-stay-violation/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#160; By: Jacquelyn L. Mascetti St. John&#8217;s Law Student American Bankruptcy Institute Law Review Staff &#160; Recently the Fifth Circuit, in St. Paul Fire &#38; Marine Ins. Co. v. Labuzan,[i]expanded the definition of &#8220;individual&#8221; in 362(k) to include creditors as parties able to bring an action for a violation of the automatic stay.&#160;Debtor, Contractor Technology, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;</p>
<div style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; line-height: 15pt"><span style="font-size: 12pt">By: Jacquelyn L. Mascetti</span></div>
<div style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; line-height: 15pt"><span style="font-size: 12pt">St. John&rsquo;s</span><span style="font-size: 12pt"> Law Student</span></div>
<div style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; line-height: 15pt"><i><span style="font-size: 12pt">American <a href="http://www.bankruptcy-articles.com" >Bankruptcy</a> Institute Law Review</span></i><span style="font-size: 12pt"> Staff</span></div>
<div style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; line-height: 15pt">&nbsp;</div>
<div style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; line-height: 15pt"><span style="font-size: 12pt">Recently the Fifth Circuit, in <i>St. Paul Fire &amp; Marine Ins. Co. v. Labuzan,</i><a title="" href="#_edn1" name="_ednref1"><span><span><span style="font-size: 12pt; line-height: 115%">[i]</span></span></span></a>expanded the definition of &ldquo;individual&rdquo; in 362(k) to include creditors as parties able to bring an action for a violation of the automatic stay.&nbsp;Debtor, Contractor Technology, Ltd. (&ldquo;CTL&rdquo;), construction company owned by the Labuzans.&nbsp;St. Paul Fire &amp; Marine Ins. Co. (&ldquo;St. Paul&rdquo;), the insurer, issued performance and payment bonds on behalf of CTL for its ongoing projects as insurance for the projects owners in case CTL was unable to complete construction.&nbsp;The Labuzans entered into an indemnity agreement with St. Paul and agreed to be held liable if St. Paul had to pay the bonds to the project owners.&nbsp;After facing some financial difficulty, CTL decided to reorganize and voluntarily filed chapter 11.&nbsp;Shortly thereafter, St. Paul contacted the owners of CTL&rsquo;s current projects and threatened to reduce the bond insurance on the projects if the owners made any payments to CTL for any work done towards the completion of the project.<a title="" href="#_edn2" name="_ednref2"><span><span><span style="font-size: 12pt; line-height: 115%">[ii]</span></span></span></a> Caving to the threats, the project owners stopped sending payments to CTL, which drained its remaining assets to pay expenses, and forced the company to convert its proposed reorganization into <a href="http://www.bankruptcy-articles.com" >chapter 7</a> liquidation. </span></div>
<div style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; line-height: 15pt">&nbsp;</div>
<p><a href="http://stjohns.abiworld.org/node/80" target="_blank">read more</a></p>
<p>View full post on <a href="http://stjohns.abiworld.org/node/80">Bankruptcy Case Blog</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bankruptcy-articles.com/2010/05/a-creditor-may-recover-damages-for-stay-violation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

