The Chapter 13 plans of two debtors in separate cases were not proposed in good faith and thus could not be confirmed. Although the court did not doubt the “real world bona fides” of the debtor, they were seeking another round of debt forgiveness despite being ineligible for Chapter 7 relief, due to past filings. Moreover, the debtors were not adjusting their debts through their proposed plans, consistent with the purpose of Chapter 13, but instead sought to cancel and eliminate creditor claims via plans with durations tied only to the payment of the debtors’ attorney fees. In addition, allowing the cases, which were basically Chapter 7 cases hidden within Chapter 13 petitions, to go forward would effectively invalidate the statutory eight-year hiatus between Chapter 7 discharges and replace it with another, shorter statutory period applicable to Chapter 13 cases.